Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged flickr

Flickr Adds People Tagging. And It’s Better Than Facebook’s.

flickrpepMy mother always yells at me when she looks at my pictures on Flickr, saying that I don’t take enough pictures of people. The truth is, I do, I just put most of those on Facebook because it’s a billion times better for pictures of your friends because you can easily tag them. Now Flickr is gaining the same functionality — but better.

Its new “People In Photos” feature is long overdue. With it, you’ll be able to select a picture and start typing a person’s name, which will then scan your Flickr contacts to see who it should add as a tag to the picture. And like Facebook, you’ll be able to draw an outline around someone’s face to show exactly who they are in the picture.

But the reason this feature is even better than Facebook’s functionality is the opt-out and opt-in options. While most users love the people tagging for photos in Facebook, just about everyone wishes there were more options that allow you to opt-out of being tagged in certain photos. You can untag yourself, or block people from tagging you, but there isn’t a good case-by-case method of doing this.

Flickr is offering that by allowing you to opt-out of being tagged in individual photos. And once you opt-out, unlike Facebook, no one can put you back into that photo. You can also set who is able to tag you in photos. And you can set who is able to tag people in photos that you shared.

The stength Facebook has over Flickr is that you probably have many more contacts, or at the very least, actual friends on Facebook. Because Flickr relies on your Flickr contact list, it probably won’t be as useful as Facebook’s, at least at first. But this is a great incentive to get you adding more contacts on Flickr, and encouraging your friends to sign up.

Users have long been working around Flickr’s lag of people photo tagging by doing it manually in the tag section of pictures. Now it’s getting a whole lot better. Undoubtedly, some users will hate this feature, but they can opt-out entirely from being tagged.

When you’re tagged in a photo, it will show up in your recent activity stream. And Flickr has revamped users’ profiles to show pictures you’re tagged in.

[photo: flickr/spuz]

-1

-2

-3

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Flickr Changes Its DMCA TakeDown Policy for Copyright Infringement Claims

As explained in my article on "Using the DMCA Takedown Notice to Battle Copyright Infringement," the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) states that while an Internet Service Provider (ISP) is not liable for transmitting information that may infringe a copyright, the ISP must remove materials from users' websites that appear to constitute copyright infringement after it receives proper notice. But some uses of copyrighted works may be a "fair use," not an infringement (read more about fair use in my article). While only a court of law can make that decision, some uses appear more likely to be allowed by law.

Such was the case with a photograph of President Obama. As The New York Times reported, the controvery started with an image created by Firas Alkhateeb, showing President Obama wearing the makeup of the Joker. The underlying photo came from TIME magazine's cover. After Alkhateeb uploaded his photo to Flickr, an unknown third party added the word of "socialism" at the bottom of the image.

After it received a DMCA takedown notice, Flickr took the image down. But the notice likely did not come from the copyright owner or the owner's agent, as required by DMCA. Thomas Hawk reported on his investigation into the purported author of the notice.

After all of this, Flickr has made a change to its DMCA policy, reportedly from a suggestion by a Flickr user. A Flickr staff member explained the change:

Upon receipt of a complete NOI [notice of infringement], the US Copyright Team will replace the image with a new static image that bears the following copy:

"This image has been removed due to a claim of copyright infringement."

Flickr will send a message to the member about the claim, remove the questionable image, but leave the metadata and comments posted.

This seems to be an excellent compromise to a serious problem. Congrats, Flickr, for adapting your policies to accomodate the current state of things.

Just Some General Venting…

At first this started out to be a quick lit­tle post to friend­feed, but as I went along flesh­ing out what I wanted to say, it become clear this would be much bet­ter as a blog post…

For weeks I’ve been think that a lit­tle script I put together has been (via mutt) email­ing pho­tos to flickr. Only when I vis­ited my flickr page I see that there hasn’t been any new pho­tos add since I updated Ubuntu to 9.10.

Seems that how mutt processed the com­mand line changed so noth­ing was had been sent since Oct 30, 20 days ago (as of when I started writ­ing this).